MYP Design Year 1 · Unit 4 · Lesson 37
Second-Life Product Challenge
L37 · 01

Test & Evaluate

Evaluation is not “I like it.” It is a claim about success supported by authentic test evidence.

Criterion D lens
T
TEST METHODOutline a relevant method that generates data.
E
EVALUATEUse authentic testing to outline success against the criteria.
I
IMPROVE + IMPACTOutline what should improve and how the solution affects the user.
Use ← → / Space to navigate.Lesson 37 · Formal D
Learning Focus
Criterion D.i–iv
L37 · 02

Today students will…

01

Outline

simple relevant testing methods that generate data.

02

Evaluate

success against the success criteria using authentic test evidence.

03

Improve

outline how the solution could be improved.

04

Impact

outline the effect on the intended user / target audience.

Formal Criterion DAll four strands
Mini-Lesson
A test method needs data
L37 · 03

Too vague

“I will see if it works.”

Relevant + data-producing

“A user will place and remove five pencils three times. I will record successful removals and ask for a 1–5 ease-of-use rating.”

OUTLINEGive the main test steps and show what data will be recorded.
D.iSimple is enough when it is relevant
Choose Testing Methods
Match the criterion to evidence
L37 · 04
Performance test

Count, time, capacity, stability, repeated function, pass/fail.

User trial

Observe the intended / representative user completing the real task.

Measurement

Check size, fit, clearance, or another measurable requirement.

User feedback

Use a short rating plus a specific comment about the experience.

At least one test should involve authentic use where appropriate.D.i
Testing Quality
Authentic enough to matter
L37 · 05

Use the product the way it was designed to be used.

Appropriate tester

Intended user or teacher-approved representative user.

Real task

Do the actual holding, organizing, carrying, supporting, or access task.

Honest data

Record the result you get, including failure.

Authentic product testingD.ii evidence
Workshop
Testing Stations
L37 · 06
Test

Plan → test → record → evaluate.

01

Plan

Outline 2–3 relevant test methods.

02

Performance

Collect count / time / measurement / pass-fail data.

03

User

Run an authentic user trial and collect a rating/comment.

04

Evaluate

Compare the evidence to the criteria.

Main workshopD.i + D.ii
Evidence → Evaluation
Make the claim match the data
L37 · 07
CriterionWhat should the product achieve?
EvidenceWhat did the authentic test show?
EvaluationMet · partly met · not met, with evidence.
D.iiEvidence-based success
Improvement
Respond to the weakest evidence
L37 · 08

Generic

“I would make it better.”

Evidence-based

“The product tipped in 2 of 5 retrieval trials. I would widen the base or lower the storage height, then repeat the same test.”

D.iiiImprovement should answer evidence
Impact on the User
What changes because the solution exists?
L37 · 09

Positive impact

Does the solution make a task easier, clearer, more organized, less wasteful, or more convenient for the user?

Limit / unintended impact

Does it take extra space, need maintenance, create another inconvenience, or only work for some users?

D.iv

Outline the impact on the user / target audience, not the impact on your grade.

User perspectiveD.iv
Unit 4 Reflection
Sustainability + evidence
L37 · 10

Finish the unit with one insight.

“A second-life material becomes good design only when _______.”

What comes next?

Unit 5 brings the full A → B → C → D cycle together in the year’s major Product Development project.